![]() ![]() ![]() The ramping angle should be respected on any maximum stepdown value and should ramp the tool down at that angle until the maximum stepdown has been reached - cut the contour, and then repeat if there are additional stepdowns until the path is to be working correctly here, in your file you have a Stock set in the Setup that has an offset of 0.0393701in and you have also a setting of 0.0984252in for a Ramp Clearance Height, so, Fusion is looking at where everything is and adds it all up so in your example you had to go to 0.89in in order to have the 45 degree angle go to the selected Contour whichis at the bottom of the material and is actually at a total distance of 0.8877953in so that is why you needed the 0.89in, in fact if I input the 0.8877953in value for the Max Ramp Stepdown the it does do the 45 degrees correctly, if I make it just the 0. The workaround is simple now that you have pointed it out: set the maximum stepdown to something ridiculously high so that it respects the specified ramping angle, but it's still definitely a bug. 85" or over, the ramping angle suddenly works as intended. However, if you set the maximum stepdown to anything. Only it seems like it picked up the contour from that, because I went back to delete the body I thought was not needed (the second one), and it didnt warn me about any dependencies. In the example, we’ll show how you can edit, delete, and modify those. In this episode of Fusion 360 Minute, we will be looking at how to configure a more cost effective alternative to the space mouse (see more here: ) using. Then suddenly Fusion was able to find the contour, so I abandoned that. That’s because selecting contours directly off the model in Fusion CAM is great most of the timeuntil it isn’t. Alt click on a line and it will dump you right into Open Contour selection. It’s time for another CAM QUICK TIP, this time covering something we get questions on all the time: contour selection. And to edit and toggle between open and closed contours. Playing with tangential extension (negative value) and eliminating your arc lead in/out might get you what you want. 84" and the generated path will be identical (ignoring the ramping angle). You could do it one of two ways: 4 seperate open contours. However, with a ramping angle of 45 degrees, you can change the maximum ramp stepdown to any value between. ![]() So, the maximum ramp stepdown is equal to both the stock and the piece to be cut (.75") - which means that the contour should cut the piece in a single pass with a compression bit while diving into the stock at the specified angle (ramping angle). The contour should be cut in a single pass with a ramp that respects the ramp angle (like all the other ramp-capable cuts). In this example, there is a 12"x12"x.75" plate that should be cut out of a piece of 24"x48"x.75" stock. Here is an example file I created to demonstrate the issue. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |